Erasmus + 2022-1-RO01-KA220-SCH-000085964
GIS for Gist of Europe
From January 30 to February 1, 2023, the first Kick-off
meeting of the project participants took
place in Latvia, Riga.
Meetings’ Minutes
Meeting details:
Location:
|
Country: Latvia
School: Riga Secondary School No. 25
Room No. 403
|
Dates:
|
- the
30th January 2023,
- the
31st January 2023.
|
Participants
This kick-off meeting was attended by the coordinators and teachers of
each partner institutions. The online participants attended the meeting via
Google meet.
|
Face to Face:
Karl Donert – Belgium
Zehra Canbolat – Türkiye
Ali Canbolat – Türkiye
Galina Safronova – Estonia
Aleksei Ilves - Estonia
Rafael de Miguel - Spain
Gita Šulce - Latvia
Tālivaldis Mežis - Latvia
Rudīte Liepiņa - Latvia
Inguna Gustava - Latvia
Viata Ozola - Latvia
Online:
Alexandra Anicolaesei – Romania
Elefteriu Crina-Aurelia – Romania
Simina Bohâlțeanu – Romania
Marius Puțintelnicu – Romania
|
Agenda
|
1.
Various questions on the starting of the project
2.
Review of the Evaluation made by the Romanian NA on
our project
3.
Reflections on the suggestions from the training
session for Erasmus+ project coordinators
4.
Proposals for the 1st online LTT in Romania
5.
Debate on the videos content
6.
Methodology on the teachers’ focus group
7.
Presentation of Admin project app
8.
Debate on case studies content
9.
Consultation on eTwinning project start
10. Review on the
meeting feedback survey items
11. Contractual issues
|
Meeting Notes
1.
Various questions on the starting of the project
During this meeting, the partners went through the approved project once
again, pondering on how to begin working on each Work Package and setting
action points and where relevant deadlines.
The coordinator, the Romanian team was asked to produce an implementation
plan template for each partner to fill according to the Gantt chart previously
established.
EUROGEO and IEA will work on setting up the basis and structure of the LMS
Platform „GIS for the future”. IEA and EUROGEO will meet in the next weeks to
review the platform and prepare for LTT-1 EUROGEO advised to use a single Google Drive for the project which would be
structured in the following categories: Admin / Contracts, Evaluation and
Quality Assurance, LTTs, Reporting, Sharing and promotion, WP1 Management, WP2
LMS, WP3 case studies, WP3 eLearning.
2. Review of the Evaluation made by the Romanian NA on
our project
The Romanian coordinator presented the Evaluation sheet provided by the
Romanian NA after the approval of the project, focusing on suggestions for a
better implementation.
The Romanian and the Turkish partners previously tried to adjust the
already drafted project according to the NA suggestions, so as to better guide
the work of the project. Both the Evaluation sheet and the re-drafted project
were put on the drive of the project.
The Eurogeo coordinator considered that these amendments are not helpful.
Much more practical it would be to focus directly on the work products
and the target group. This was because the original proposal forms part of the
contract between the coordinating organization and the NA .
The UNIZAR coordinator encouraged the partners not to be deterred by the low score, since the project will be evaluated after 2 years of hard work under other guidelines and also mentioned that one of their last projects met 92 points in the final evaluation.
Nonetheless partners considered the comments made in evaluation and addressed them in discussion.
3. Reflections on the suggestions from the training
session for Erasmus+ project coordinators
The approved projects Training Session in Romania took place in Bucharest
and was attended by the legal representative of the coordinating school. This
session focussed on several aspects:
1.Reports. Documents
2. IT tools
3. Team activities
4. Communication
5. Dissemination
6. Security measures,
encryption
7. Financial
8. Control
9. Project evaluation
10. Project
coordination
11. Project monitoring
These instructions were presented by the Romanian coordinator and consulted
with each partner as follows:
As for the first aspect, the progress report will need to be
submitted after one-year, on November 30, 2023.
Working methods were discussed and would include the following
elements:
- Implementation planning, including partners and
project details (the coordinator already drafted a Gantt chart and an
implementation plan template for each partner to use),
- Self-evaluation and partner/project evaluation
planning (the Latvian host will come up with a feedback survey, that would
stand as a reference for the rest of the meetings surveys),
- Communication plan for partners and the project
(Eurogeo coordinator suggested to use the Admin Project tool, rather thab
the Whatsapp group. A gmail group and Google Drive should be
implemented), EUROGEO would provide the tool to the project partners
- Dissemination plan for visibility and partners
(Latvian and Romanian partners will start an eTwinning project and the
Estonian partner will manage the instagram and facebook accounts, the rest
of the partners having the responsibility of periodically publishing
relevant news of the project),
- Monitoring approach with indicators for each
partner and work package (the indicators were already drafted in the
beginning of the project but they will be adjusted to the project needs as
things progress),
- Risk management plan with prevention measures and
risk management strategies (the Romanian and Turkish partners already
drafted a plan, but asked for a more propositions from the rest of the
partners),
- Periodic financial reports detailing spending by
each partner (the Romanian financial adviser will provide a
template),
- Partnership agreements with each partner (they
will need to also be signed by the legal representative in person),
- Project header information should be used -
according to the new regulations,
- Meeting minutes and Attendance lists - will be
written by the end of each meeting, Certificates will also be
provided,
- Privacy statements and evaluation questionnaires
need to be drafted for each meeting, Meeting agendas will be prepared for
physical and online mobilities, Press releases will be done when relevant
info is shared while Network postings will be kept to date, as well as
Dissemination presentations.
The reports to the NA are to be made in the Romanian language and should
include information on each partner, work package, and activity. The reports
for each partner should detail costs, activities, results, and indicators. The
reporting should be narrative and may include links to web pages that support
the activity. Additionally, reporting on beneficiary tools should be included.
English versions of the reports should be prepared by the coordinator for
the partners, for transparency.
Regarding the IT tools, the reporting tools that are available for
beneficiaries include the following:
Beneficiary module: This is the main reporting tool that will be used by
beneficiaries to report on their progress and activities.
EPRP (Electronic Platform for Research and Professional Development): This
tool can be used for dissemination purposes and does not require a separate
project website. Partners and stakeholders can be directed to the EPRP, where
links to relevant information can be shared.
ESEP (European School Education Platform): This tool is used in eTwinning
and can be used for both physical and online mobility activities. It can also
be used in hybrid formats, where both pupils and teachers participate. The ESEP
requires double identification and can be accessed using EU Login or a Gmail
account from the contract.
EURYDICE (European Unit for Statistics, Analysis, and Documentation on
Education): This tool provides information on education policies. The
description of the Romanian education system must include information on the
integration of emigrants and the implementation of digital education.
The Eurogeo coordinator argued that better visibility is offered by social
media so we should focus on those and the site of the project. And of course
the AdminProject app will most definitely help us in keeping everything
together.
As for the team activities, the coordinator must maintain a
timely relationship with partners for them to hand over the requested
documents. The monitoring and uploading will be done on the Beneficiary Module
platform (the main reporting tool) and the coordinator will upload there using
the gmail account from the financing contract. This platform is yet unavailable
for the time being.
Communication with partners and the Agency can be online
or/ and written throughout the project, as agreed from the beginning.
Communication is NOT visibility, but identity, brand and display on all
documents of the EU emblem. Archiving can be on the drive. Any change in the
project shall be notified to the Agency. It is only after the agency's opinion
that the proposed/notified amendment is put into practice. No notification is
made for changing the period of activity. The important thing is that it
unfolds, so there is flexibility.
The dissemination plan matters a lot in the Final Report.
Visibility means EU logo with text: "co-financed by the EU"/ "Co
founded EU" is mandatory (not the Erasmus+ logo). Project values must be
expressed.
We must disseminate following a communication plan:
Objectives and Target group
Communication messages and channels adapted to the target
audience
Activities should be authentic and creative
Monitoring - Evaluation - Improvement indicators
Communication principles: KISS/ Keep It Short and Simple -
the simpler, the better; without long- simple posts in vocabulary.
Sustainability
through green - active on networks
To be inclusive in communication / dissemination: images of
different ethnicities, different ages..
For photos in the project: agreements/partners. Each
partner makes sure of GDPR, especially with minors
Involve all actors
Personalized events
As for the security measures/ encryption of personal data,
no personal data is to be made public anywhere. The property rights - tools to
verify plagiarism and self-plagiarism for results, information, documents from
each partner, activity. The application form is the intellectual property of
all partners.
Regarding the financial criteria, what the Grant does not
cover will be covered from other sources by all partners since "The
European Commission did not intend to cover all the costs." The costs will
comply with the accounting/justified, documented principles, etc. Implicit
co-financing may also mean: work, location in school, equipment in school.
The Romanian coordinator may ask supporting documents from the partners such
as:
Minutes
Attendance lists
Certificates
Presentations
Activity reports
For the payment of
the members of the project team, an Addendum to the basic employment contract
will be drafted, not a service contract.
Bank fees are not eligible - they are paid from the
local/school budget.
As for the control, some regulatory documents are to be
respected, especially the financing contract. There is an obligation to keep
documents for 5 years. The verification is based on the risk covered criteria/
centered on the system and institution. Project framework will be checked in accordance with:
procedures, regulations and resources.
The coordinating school is financially and responsible for
the partners.
The final report needs to meet a minimum of 70 points at
the project evaluation. Each work package is evaluated separately and then all
the scores are gathered and the average is made. Very important is the quality
of the activities and the evaluators will ask what measures have we taken to
ensure the quality of the activities in the project. Also the principles of transparency and
traceability (documentation, eligibility, financial management) are essential.
Activities generate costs, but the costs must be eligible for the activity.
Regarding the project coordination, the coordinator school
notified the partners as soon as the Grant had been obtained. In the following
weeks, the partners reviewed the project proposal together with the
Recommendation Sheet - since it has an effect in the Final Report. The
recommendation/observation sheet from the AN was translated into English and
was sent to the partners together with the application form and Annex II.
The coordinating school drew up the Partnership Agreement
in 7 points: Clauses, Responsibilities, Activities, Budget, Period, Financial
provisions with Payment terms, Reporting deadlines. If a partner withdraws, a
replacement must be found. Each partner will name their project team.
The NA recommended the elaboration of the necessary tools
in the implementation of the project: store GDrive documents, online budget,
Diagram GANTT and Procedures.
The Implementation plan per each partner was designed to
have: Objectives, Work packages, Necessary resources/ human and financial,
Responsible, Deadlines, Expected results and Indicators
Each partner will draw an Evaluation plan -
self-evaluation and also a
Dissemination plan regarding:
Activity type, What is disseminated, Target audience, Communication channel,
Persons involved, Budget, Deadline.
The communication with each partner will be done through
WhatsApp. The Beneficiary Module and the Project Results Platform will be
accessed after the Intermediate report ( a narrative thread is expected of each
partner)
Partners must be
consulted, we do not impose, but we consult. Eurogeo coordinator also suggested
for each entity to have a designated person for the voting if there are any
disagreements.
The monitoring of work packages in implementation is done
through the list of indicators drafted in the beginning of the project. Eurogeo
and the Romanian coordinator requested the other partners to review the
indicators from a SMART scale point of view.
4. Proposals for the 1st online LTT in Romania (LTT-1)
The Romanian coordinator presented the draft for the 1st online LTT in
Romania and each partner was asked to come up with suggestions. The document
was uploaded to Google drive so that comments and suggestions can be made.
During the LTT each partner is expected to contribute. All partners were tasked
to come up with proposals of activities for it by February 10th.
At the LTT, the schools are expected to be present with at least 3 members,
IEA with at least 2 members and Eurogeo and Unizar with 1 member each.
The partners agreed that the meeting should be from the 20th to the 24th of
February 2023 (just as specified in the submitted project), 2h availability
online a day from 19.00 EET to 21.00 EET.
5. Debate on the videos content
The Turkish and the Romanian team proposed tutorial-like videos, whilst the
Eurogeo coordinator mentioned that these types of videos are not useful as the
GIS tools are updasted every 6 months. The software company alrteady has very
productive multi-lingual training resources, so encouraged every partner to
rethink the content of the videos and come up with new, more fruitful ideas to
present atthe next meeting. The project concerns teaching climate change using
GIS and this should be the focus of any resources produced. How GIS can be used
and the learning and teaching that should take place.
6. eLearning module methodology
The Eurogeo coordinator proposed each school partner should run a focus
group of their teachers, the purpose would be to discuss their issues and the
actual situation concerning teaching climate change in the classroom and with
GIS.
EUROGEO prepared a written methodology shared on the Google Drive. Each
school partner was asked to review the methodology, carry out the focus group
in their schools and report back on what the teachers said, on how they see the
challenge of teaching about climate in LTT-1. The focus group should have 4 to
10 teachers, a moderator and there should be 5 to 6 main questions asked.
After the discussions, the partners were asked to create a powerpoint
presentation (2 slides maximum) with the main conclusions of the focus group
that will be exposed at the 1st online LTT in Romania. These would form the
basis of discussion for the eLearning modules and further LMS development.
7. Presentation of Admin project app
The Eurogeo coordinator presented the Admin project app that is a great
tool for managing Erasmus+ projects. He suggested we use it to keep good track
of our project since it has a user-friendly interface, and it is easy to
use.
Moreover, it has a lot of features that make it ideal for managing
projects. These features include the possibility to view and edit all project
details in one place, to add team members and assign tasks to them, and to keep
track of the project budget. The app can be used for both the management and
the monitoring of projects. The benefits of using the Admin project app include
saving time as everything is well organized in one place, having an easy way to
assign tasks to team members, having an overview of all the activities in the
project at all times, and being able to keep track of the budget for the
project.
The Eurogeo coordinator proposed to share his paid version with the
project, the only inconvenience being that large files cannot be hosted and
collaborative work on documents is not possible, thus the use of Google Drive
was a necessity.
8. Debate on case studies content
Several ideas were shared on creating the LMS and on how to start the
eLearning Module.
A debate on case studies content regarding using GIS to fight climate
change issued, focusing on: effectiveness (Eurogeo argued that the approaches
need to be more effective) and data accuracy (Eurogeo also mentioned that the
project cannot provide for more robust data collection methods, especially due
to cost and time consuming processes).
Thus we decided to rethink the content of the case studies to fit the aim
and limitations of our project.
An example of teacher case studies using Storymapping was presented (https://www.geocapabilities.org/geocapabilities-3/case-studies/). It was agreed that teacher case studies would enable the
project to examine and evaluate its outcomes. The teachers would be trained to
use the storymapping tool and the results would offer great potential for
dissemination. 9. Consultation on e-Twinning project start
The Romanian coordinator asked the Latvian coordinator to share eTwinning
account details in order to set up the eTwinning project together, just as
mentioned in the submitted project. The Romanian coordinator also asked for the
rest of the partners to offer suggestions on the proposal to be drafted of the
eTwinning project.
10. Review on the meeting feedback survey items
The Romanian staff gave a few suggestions on what might constitute survey
items that could easily be used also in the next meetings:
1. Name and surname
2. Email
3. Institution and country
4. How useful were this kick off meeting's discussions?
5. How interesting were this kick off meeting's activities?
6. Name one idea/ tool you discovered and will most surely use during this
project.
7. How was your exchange experience with the teachers/ partners from
the other countries?
8. How do you feel at the end of this kick off meeting?
9. Suggestions for the next mobilities/ meetings.
11. Contractual issues
All partners remained very concerned about the lack of correct contractual
arrangements which had so far been implemented by the coordinating partner.
These would be easy to solve but needed the presence of the legal
representative of the coordinating partner.
EUROGEO was asked to write as soon as possible to the legal representative,
who had not not available to participate in the meeting, asking her for an
online meeting in the following week to clarify these issues. EUROGEO would
create a Doodle poll for all partners to complete.
Action plan
Action
|
Assigned to
|
Due date
|
Review indicators
|
Each institution coordinator
|
20th February 2023
|
ETwinning project creation
|
Romanian and Latvian team
|
20th February 2023
|
Financial report template
|
Romanian financial adviser
|
20th February 2023
|
Review the 1st online LTT in Romania plan
|
Each institution coordinator and staff
|
20th February 2023
|
Focus group discussions held in school
|
Each institution coordinator and staff
|
20th February 2023
|
Rethink the content of the videos and case studies
|
Each institution coordinator and staff
|
20th February 2023
|
PPT as a result of the focus group discussions
|
Each institution coordinator
|
20th February 2023
|
Introducing the project to the Admin project app
|
Eurogeo staff
|
20th February 2023
|
Implementation plan
|
Each institution staff
|
20th February 2023
|
Drafting Privacy statements
|
Each institution coordinator
|
20th February 2023
|
LMS
|
EUROGEO and IEA to meet, set up and discuss LMS
|
10th February 2023
|
Logo and branding
|
Estonian team to make proposals to project partners
|
15th February 2023
|
Web site
|
Estonian team to set up
|
15th February 2023
|
Social media
|
Estonian and Turkish teams to set up
|
20th February 2023
|
Contractual issues
|
EUROGEO write to legal representative of coordinating partner. EUROGEO
set up Doodle poll and arrange meeting
|
2nd February 2023
|
Contractual issues
|
ALl partners respond to Doodle poll
|
6th February 2023
|
LTT-1
|
IEA and EUROGEO to plan and meet
|
10th February 2023
|
Conclusion
The overall impression was that this meeting was a
success and a positive development in the progress of the Erasmus+ project. The
discussions led during our project’s kick-off meeting were perceived positively
by those in attendance since they were seen as a productive and valuable step
forward in the Erasmus+ project. The attendees felt that the meeting helped to
further clarify goals, establish plans, and build momentum towards achieving
the objectives of the project.
Other events of
the Kick-off meeting:
30.01.2023.
Greetings
from the Director of Riga Secondary School No. 25.
We
attended a Viata Ozola geography lesson on creating interactive maps and
presentations.
Joint
dinner.
31.01.2023.
Presentation
of the Latvian education system. Inguna Gustava.
Time
of certificates. Gita Šulce, Tālivaldis Mežis, Rudīte Liepiņa, Viata Ozola,
Inguna Gustava.
Excursion
from students of Riga Secondary School No. 25 in the old town of Riga.
01.02.2023.
Visiting
the building of the Faculty of Geography of the University of Riga.
Faculty
of Physics and Medicine.
National
Riga Library.
Envirotech
– Presentation on GIS in Latvia.
Joint
final dinner.
No comments:
Post a Comment